Leaderboard github.com
AgentiaPT/vela-slides
Vela Slides - AI Powered presentation App and Agent Skill
AI provenance
99%
explicit
- Confidence
- 95%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
60/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
62/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
- Repository: https://github.com/AgentiaPT/vela-slides
- Commit:
5fd55089988179a59b67d29c9abfe76c4d45ef8b - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:52:59+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 99 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 60 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 62 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 99% of first-party code added; an estimated 99% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 98.9%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 98.9%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 513 | 137,364 |
| GitHub Copilot coding agent | 49 | 13,514 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 62,547 of 63,652.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 3.086 | 6.335 | 0.49x |
| Security | 3.613 | 14.48 | 0.25x |
- Stylometry index: 3.48 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 15, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 361). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03 | 59,067 | 99% |
| 2026-04 | 6,814 | 91% |
| 2026-05 | 897 | 100% |
| 2026-06 | 5,174 | 100% |
| 2026-07 | 23,826 | 100% |
| 2026-08 | 28,854 | 100% |
| 2026-09 | 10,244 | 96% |
| 2026-11 | 17,675 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (348f5cb71997)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (b4cbbf083f0b)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (b7ad199923d1)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (088684d4d995)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (1a786faa2b4c)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (9904836eeaf7)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (7d4d4228e919)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (731ca90a870f)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (fa744c7485d2)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (7ad52d51e425)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (1e729ff270de)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (e6585ba5d33f)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (d6b9439ad076)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (fc8b9f69cff3)
- Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (2e79e463ff8d)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.35, CI runs tests; 30% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 40 |
| Duplication | 52 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 54 |
| Tests and CI | 83 |
| Documentation | 80 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 6,862; mean complexity 3.5, 90th percentile 7; 216 complex and 38 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 11.1% of 53,850 compared
- Tests: 22,349 test lines for 63,652 source lines (ratio 0.35); CI test commands: go test, unittest; 53% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: changelog
Most complex functions:
- RenderBlock in src/parts/part-blocks.jsx: complexity 333, 403 lines
- SlidePanel in src/parts/part-slidepanel.jsx: complexity 218, 446 lines
- innerReducer in src/parts/part-reducer.jsx: complexity 198, 241 lines
- handler in src/parts/part-slidepanel.jsx: complexity 198, 147 lines
- executeTool in src/parts/part-engine.jsx: complexity 177, 153 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 40 known vulnerabilities in 9 dependencies; 61 high-severity SAST findings; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 59 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 37 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 8 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 100 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 40 in 9 packages (critical 1, high 11, medium 25, low 3)
-
Posture checks passed: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits; missing: lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h: proxy-addr@2.0.7 (npm) is affected by GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h |
tools/vela-dev/channel/pnpm-lock.yaml |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.claude/hooks/post-edit-lint.py:208 |
| high | opengrep/python.sqlalchemy.security.sqlalchemy-execute-raw-query: Avoiding SQL string concatenation: untrusted input concatenated with raw SQL query can result in SQL Injection. In order to execute raw query safely, prepared statement should be used. SQLAlchemy provides TextualSQL to easily used prepared statement with named parameters. For complex SQL composition [confidence low] |
.claude/skills/copilot-session-cost/scripts/session-cost-report.py:354 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.claude/skills/hyper-sprint/assets/sprint-stats.py:41 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
.claude/skills/vela-browser-test/scripts/sanitizer-harness.cjs:110 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a d.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
.claude/skills/vela-browser-test/scripts/sanitizer-harness.cjs:110 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
archive/pptx-spike/verify.py:10 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/scripts/analyze-results.py:57 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/scripts/validate.py:92 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
evals/scripts/validate.py:93 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/assemble.py:54 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/assemble.py:70 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:920 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:959 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:1071 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:1087 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:1087 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
evals/skills/v12.3/scripts/vela.py:2206 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
site/build.py:693 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1153 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1192 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1304 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1304 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1320 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
skills/vela-slides/scripts/vela.py:1320 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v13.82 ships vela-desktop-v13.82-linux_arm64.zip (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v13.82 ships vela-desktop-v13.82-linux_x64.zip (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v13.82 ships vela-desktop-v13.82-mac_arm64.zip (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v13.82 ships vela-desktop-v13.82-mac_universal.zip (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v13.82 ships vela-desktop-v13.82-mac_x64.zip (1 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 63,652; test lines: 22,349
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 51,006 |
| Python | 31,248 |
| Go | 1,700 |
| Shell | 1,539 |
| TypeScript | 508 |