Leaderboard github.com
AgriciDaniel/claude-blog
Free, open source blog writer for Claude Code. Researches current sources, writes answer-first posts for Google and AI answers, has an independent reviewer score each one out of 100 and ships only after five delivery gates. 32 skills, 30 /blog commands, 5 agents. Active development at AI-Marketing-Hub/claude-blog; public releases ship here.
AI provenance
81%
explicit
- Confidence
- 95%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
64/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
81/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
- Repository: https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-blog
- Commit:
4f9c2cb8fd17f594e868d6c2ce0e8fb2c971f987 - Generated: 2026-11-14T00:00:09+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 81 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 64 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 81 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 81% of first-party code added; an estimated 81% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 81.3%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 3.2%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 81.3%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 170 | 61,728 |
| OpenAI Codex | 6 | 3,523 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 25,078 of 30,535.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 2.074 | 2.566 | 0.81x |
| Security | 0.678 | 0.55 | 1.23x |
- Stylometry index: 1.77 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 108). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02 | 2,482 | 100% |
| 2026-03 | 8,931 | 100% |
| 2026-04 | 1,634 | 100% |
| 2026-05 | 7,605 | 76% |
| 2026-07 | 27,632 | 100% |
| 2026-08 | 2,019 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 29,915 | 63% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b6dfd985cf3b)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (245c6a2026e3)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2581a9bc8057)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (6255affdd5de)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e17453eca8c3)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (309e004d7b46)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (295b4b7d74bd)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2791ee0fabad)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (6f2d815ab257)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (320665fe2da4)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (5ceac4cc086a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f0480af5f174)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c34368da5317)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (93469c4d48cd)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4a5bc401d31d)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.71, CI runs tests; 35% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 35 |
| Duplication | 69 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 50 |
| Tests and CI | 90 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | 0 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 907; mean complexity 6.7, 90th percentile 15; 80 complex and 23 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 6.3% of 24,176 compared
- Tests: 21,770 test lines for 30,535 source lines (ratio 0.71); CI test commands: pytest; 59% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Most complex functions:
- calculate_score in scripts/analyze_blog.py: complexity 139, 474 lines
- gate_5_asset_link_integrity in scripts/blog_preflight.py: complexity 80, 240 lines
- validate in scripts/validate_public_release.py: complexity 79, 322 lines
- _jsonld_identity_report in scripts/blog_preflight.py: complexity 77, 87 lines
- run_pagespeed in skills/blog-google/scripts/pagespeed_check.py: complexity 52, 183 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 5 known vulnerabilities in 3 dependencies; 14 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: ci actions.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 94 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 83 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 73 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 70 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 80 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 5 in 3 packages (critical 0, high 3, medium 2, low 0)
-
Posture checks passed: security policy, dependency updates; missing: signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.github/scripts/validate_plugin_tolerate_reserved_name.py:192 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
scripts/check_google_currentness.py:12 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/check_secrets.py:98 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-audio/scripts/run.py:111 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
skills/blog-audio/scripts/run.py:111 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-audio/scripts/setup_environment.py:80 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-google/scripts/run.py:121 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
skills/blog-google/scripts/run.py:121 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-google/scripts/setup_environment.py:77 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-notebooklm/scripts/run.py:116 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
skills/blog-notebooklm/scripts/run.py:116 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-notebooklm/scripts/setup_environment.py:85 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-notebooklm/scripts/setup_environment.py:100 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-notebooklm/scripts/setup_environment.py:216 |
| high | osv/GHSA-3jp2-3mrg-2vxc: oauthlib@4.0.0 (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-3jp2-3mrg-2vxc |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-6655-6qjp-jx7x: soupsieve@2.10 (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-6655-6qjp-jx7x |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-mmhr-3c5m-f64f: soupsieve@2.10 (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-mmhr-3c5m-f64f |
uv.lock |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.insecure-file-permissions: These permissions 0o700 are widely permissive and grant access to more people than may be necessary. A good default is 0o644 which gives read and write access to yourself and read access to everyone else. [confidence medium] |
scripts/blog_preflight.py:182 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.insecure-file-permissions: These permissions 0o700 are widely permissive and grant access to more people than may be necessary. A good default is 0o644 which gives read and write access to yourself and read access to everyone else. [confidence medium] |
scripts/blog_preflight.py:376 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
scripts/check_google_currentness.py:39 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.regex_dos: Detected usage of re.compile with an inefficient regular expression. This can lead to regular expression denial of service, which can result in service down time. Instead, check all regexes or use safer alternatives such as pyre2. [confidence low] |
scripts/cognitive_load.py:110 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-google/scripts/google_auth.py:449 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
skills/blog-google/scripts/google_auth.py:674 |
| medium | osv/GHSA-mf5v-w3w3-f6cg: opentelemetry-api@1.45.1 (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-mf5v-w3w3-f6cg |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-7g44-g9rc-x53w: soupsieve@2.10 (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-7g44-g9rc-x53w |
uv.lock |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 30,535; test lines: 21,770
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 50,257 |
| PowerShell | 1,614 |
| Shell | 434 |