Leaderboard github.com
Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version
Chinese Translation for Machine Learning Infographics
insufficient-source
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 46%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
—
Not scored: no supported files or tools failed.
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
—
Not scored: no supported files or tools failed.
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
- Repository: https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version
- Commit:
6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37 - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:22:25+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
Insufficient first-party source code to score quality or security (under 100 lines). An empty or README-only repository is not evidence of safety.
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 46% | 100% |
| Code quality | not scored | |||
| Security | not scored |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 6.00 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 6, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-08 | 68 | 0% |
Evidence
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 1: Importing the libraries ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L3))
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 2: Importing dataset ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L7))
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 3: Handling the missing data ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L17))
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 4: Encoding categorical data ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L28))
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 5: Splitting the datasets into training sets and Test sets ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L44))
- step-by-step narration comment: #Step 6: Feature Scaling ([Code/Day 1_D](https://github.com/Avik-Jain/100-Days-of-ML-Code-Chinese-Version/blob/6adcfa4a3398cfc62c1d44e48a9585379e4c3f37/Code/Day 1_Data Prepocessing.py#L58))
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 68; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 68 |