RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite

An immersive RPG enhancement extension for SillyTavern — character tracking, lore library, TTS highlighting, portrait bar, scene headers, chat bubbles, weather effects, and more.

  • View repository ↗
  • JavaScript
  • ★ 63
  • commit 1bb0ebc34bc5
  • scored 2026-11-13
  • scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

98%

explicit

Confidence
95%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

45/100

poor

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

57/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 98 explicit 95% 100%
Code quality 45 poor 90% 100%
Security 57 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 98% of first-party code added; an estimated 98% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 98.3%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 98.3%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 764 92,875
OpenAI Codex 1 44

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 68,037 of 68,668.

Findings per 1,000 lines AI-attributed Other Ratio
Quality 2.366 3.17 0.75x
Security 4.321 9.509 0.45x
  • Stylometry index: 2.42 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 14, placeholders 1, assistant phrasing 1, emoji 296). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-02 26,254 100%
2026-03 8,380 100%
2026-04 6,503 90%
2026-05 4,602 80%
2026-06 5,272 100%
2026-07 3,840 100%
2026-08 1,730 100%
2026-09 10,450 100%
2026-10 27,191 100%
2026-11 309 100%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: author email noreply@anthropic.com (1bb0ebc34bc5)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (893b1e17f00f)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (592bc2897569)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (051624f65037)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7f1e5b733eb3)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b16ab8fc2a4b)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (89f3e7defe28)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e35f4638ade6)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (766611b7828e)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c7aa4c28459d)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (6d2266a2f8a9)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c3063376966a)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e9772c811061)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (55f0ba82c67f)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bea27c755c9a)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 32% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 38
Duplication 77
Code smells (Opengrep) 71
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 85
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 4,851; mean complexity 4.0, 90th percentile 8; 211 complex and 36 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 4.3% of 53,637 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 68,668 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 70 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 27
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 20
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] index.js:3950
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesEl.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] index.js:3950
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/features/diceRolls.js:1368
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a span.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/features/diceRolls.js:1368
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/features/inventory.js:445
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a span.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/features/inventory.js:445
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:96
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a tmp.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:96
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1209
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesText.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1209
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1217
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a tempContainer.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1217
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1312
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesText.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1312
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1348
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesText.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1348
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1362
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a div.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1362
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1380
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesText.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1380
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1389
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a mesText.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/chatBubbles.js:1389
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/glintWords.js:504
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a tpl.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/glintWords.js:504
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] src/systems/rendering/lorebook.js:121

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 68,668; test lines: 0
Language Lines
JavaScript 68,668

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DangerDaza/Dooms-Enhancement-Suite/)