Leaderboard github.com
DenisSergeevitch/ex-ussr-kinship-research
Evidence-first genealogy skill for AI agents (Codex, Claude Code): church books, civil, military, deportation and repression records across the former USSR. Replies in your language.
AI provenance
40%
explicit
- Confidence
- 95%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
62/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
75/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
- Repository: https://github.com/DenisSergeevitch/ex-ussr-kinship-research
- Commit:
3db37dafe5339490531c7e5ba1008a2ff14e24a1 - Generated: 2026-11-14T00:05:31+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 40 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 62 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 75 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 40% of first-party code added; an estimated 40% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 40.4%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 35.8%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 40.4%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Codex | 174 | 733 |
| Claude Code | 87 | 1,949 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,500 of 2,606.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 0.0 | 0.0 | n/a |
| Security | 0.667 | 0.904 | 0.74x |
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 5,398 | 27% |
| 2026-11 | 1,247 | 100% |
Evidence
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (1d4226de0d49)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (af02a9ef6137)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (1abcb4f2ca5c)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (40b5da589dd1)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (0e0dc5465f49)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (6571345c03f1)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (f437a91f2d15)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (60d6815c6516)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (becae22ef51c)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (8a046e6ceac7)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (98362b9a38eb)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (7726596e39ec)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (66d75bdc51f0)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (e4fdf1d13806)
- OpenAI Codex: on merged branch (3db37dafe5) (bfe3308019e8)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.70, no CI test run detected; 54% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 20 |
| Duplication | 97 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 55 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 100; mean complexity 9.7, 90th percentile 23; 17 complex and 1 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.6% of 2,113 compared
- Tests: 1,833 test lines for 2,606 source lines (ratio 0.70); CI test commands: none detected; 97% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- main in scripts/audit_evidence.py: complexity 101, 253 lines
- check_registers in scripts/check_gedcom.py: complexity 78, 99 lines
- check_syntax in scripts/check_gedcom.py: complexity 52, 59 lines
- browser_import in scripts/familysearch_browser.py: complexity 47, 61 lines
- register in scripts/register_search.py: complexity 40, 91 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 82 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/build_pdf.py:224 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
scripts/gwar.py:11 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- star-burst: 2419 stars in 20 days (124/day)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 2,606; test lines: 1,833
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 4,439 |