Leaderboard github.com
FrancyJGLisboa/agent-skills-platform
Build tested agent skills and govern their lifecycle through a user-defined marketplace: evidence, discovery, updates, rollback, quarantine, and 17-platform distribution.
AI provenance
39%
explicit
- Confidence
- 95%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
55/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
47/100
poor
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
- Repository: https://github.com/FrancyJGLisboa/agent-skills-platform
- Commit:
0c6900a0597622791d1daaafc1c19b2fead0e8d4 - Generated: 2026-11-14T00:06:34+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 39 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 55 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 47 | poor | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 39% of first-party code added; an estimated 39% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 38.7%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 25.7%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 38.7%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 75 | 21,868 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 10,578 of 40,060.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 3.876 | 0.509 | 7.61x |
| Security | 0.284 | 1.085 | 0.26x |
- Stylometry index: 0.64 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 11, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 29). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-10 | 10,541 | 88% |
| 2026-02 | 3,080 | 100% |
| 2026-03 | 1,706 | 99% |
| 2026-05 | 4,817 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 2,567 | 0% |
| 2026-07 | 5,551 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 18,471 | 7% |
| 2026-09 | 9,727 | 68% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (0c6900a05976)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a7b371645e1c)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (17911cec2189)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (536c51f5ee2e)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (ce92effabd3a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (0a5515ba8917)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (9d5b30910569)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (10079678fb10)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (23d82cf3a846)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a421896a3d94)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (1a90d1137e47)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (b4a788489453)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c5769aafd23b)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (46191ce27d90)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a3442bc5300b)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.22, CI runs tests; 37% of function code in complex or long functions; 62% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 33 |
| Duplication | 2 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 74 |
| Tests and CI | 86 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | 3 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 1,230; mean complexity 6.4, 90th percentile 14; 104 complex and 34 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 62.1% of 31,240 compared
- Tests: 8,844 test lines for 40,060 source lines (ratio 0.22); CI test commands: pytest, go test, cargo test; 69% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Most complex functions:
- main in .agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py: complexity 74, 229 lines
- main in references/examples/github-release-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py: complexity 74, 229 lines
- main in references/examples/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py: complexity 74, 229 lines
- main in references/examples/pr-blocker-summarizer/scripts/run_evals.py: complexity 74, 229 lines
- main in references/examples/stock-analyzer/scripts/run_evals.py: complexity 74, 229 lines
Security
Security posture is poor: 38 known vulnerabilities in 23 dependencies; 25 high-severity SAST findings; 24 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 90 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 78 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 22 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 1 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 38 in 23 packages (critical 2, high 4, medium 8, low 4)
-
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0369: zip@4.6.1 (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0369 |
desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.lock |
| critical | osv/GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj: zip@4.6.1 (crates.io) is affected by GHSA-m665-v7pm-7grj |
desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.lock |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/evolve.py:236 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py:313 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true: Found 'subprocess' function 'run' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a malicious actor to execute commands. Use 'shell=False' instead. [confidence medium] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py:313 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py:471 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true: Found 'subprocess' function 'run' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a malicious actor to execute commands. Use 'shell=False' instead. [confidence medium] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py:472 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
.agents/skills/live-weather-briefing-skill/scripts/run_evals.py:760 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
assets/render_architecture.py:32 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/evolve_template.py:236 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/export_utils.py:605 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/generate_verification.py:103 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run_evals_template.py:313 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true: Found 'subprocess' function 'run' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a malicious actor to execute commands. Use 'shell=False' instead. [confidence medium] |
scripts/run_evals_template.py:313 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run_evals_template.py:471 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true: Found 'subprocess' function 'run' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a malicious actor to execute commands. Use 'shell=False' instead. [confidence medium] |
scripts/run_evals_template.py:472 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run_evals_template.py:760 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/semantic_recon_gate.py:95 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/semantic_recon_orchestrator.py:62 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
scripts/semantic_recon_orchestrator.py:63 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/skill_graph.py:374 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/team_marketplace.py:176 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/team_marketplace.py:191 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/team_marketplace.py:220 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/team_marketplace.py:251 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 40,060; test lines: 8,844
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 40,496 |
| PowerShell | 3,249 |
| Shell | 2,945 |
| TypeScript | 1,540 |
| Rust | 498 |
| JavaScript | 176 |