SweetJonnySauce/EDMC-Mining-Analytics

• Repository: https://github.com/SweetJonnySauce/EDMC-Mining-Analytics
• Commit: e098bfc0062440df5cc9427f61ffbd7588df7218
• Generated: 2026-11-13T23:59:05+00:00
• Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

• Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

• Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 38.8%

• Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

• AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

• Stylometry index: 0.08 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 5). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Evidence

• 9,074 lines of first-party code in ~0.9h (10,437 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (ab7ff50cf526)
• 8,509 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (2,127 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (9b0817f11f45)
• AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
• 1.1.0-alpha-2 → 1.1.0-alpha-3: 8,509 lines in 0.96 days (8,858.6 lines/day) (1.1.0-alpha-)
• 1,795 lines of first-party code in ~1.6h (1,155 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (387d1b9aa505)
• 1,982 lines of first-party code in ~2.0h (969 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (f945cd664bd3)
• 4,075 lines of first-party code in ~5.1h (794 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (62a0ce712029)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.56, no CI test run detected; 29% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

• Functions: 1,750; mean complexity 4.4, 90th percentile 9; 71 complex and 29 long functions
• Duplicated lines: 7.2% of 24,013 compared
• Tests: 16,997 test lines for 30,205 source lines (ratio 0.56); CI test commands: none detected; 18% of recent source commits also change tests
• Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

• build_summary_message in edmc_mining_analytics/integrations/discord_summary.py: complexity 62, 148 lines
• _process_cargo in edmc_mining_analytics/journal.py: complexity 58, 159 lines
• _render_results in edmc_mining_analytics/mining_ui/hotspot_search_window.py: complexity 55, 142 lines
• save in edmc_mining_analytics/preferences.py: complexity 54, 208 lines
• _update_mining_state in edmc_mining_analytics/journal.py: complexity 48, 138 lines

Security

Security posture is adequate: 4 high-severity SAST findings; 4 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

• Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

• binary-release-asset: release 1.4.0-beta-02 ships EDMC-Mining-Analytics-1.4.0-beta-02.zip (3 downloads)
• binary-release-asset: release 1.4.0-beta-01 ships EDMC-Mining-Analytics-1.4.0-beta-01.zip (53 downloads)
• binary-release-asset: release 1.3.0-beta-1 ships EDMC-Mining-Analytics-1.3.0-beta-1.zip (27 downloads)
• binary-release-asset: release 1.2.0 ships EDMC-Mining-Analytics-1.2.0.zip (1159 downloads)
• binary-release-asset: release 1.1.1 ships EDMC-Mining-Analytics-1.1.1.zip (419 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

• Source lines: 30,205; test lines: 16,997