RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft

Agent skill that turns Claude Code / Codex into a motion-design studio for voiceover-driven explainer videos — word-level voiceover sync, 109 motion recipe cards, an anti-slideshow camera system, Remotion rendering.

  • View repository ↗
  • HTML
  • ★ 2,312
  • commit 501708856fbf
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

99%

explicit

Confidence
86%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

53/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

71/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON RepoTrust ai badgeRepoTrust quality badgeRepoTrust security badge

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 99 explicit 86% 100%
Code quality 53 weak 90% 100%
Security 71 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 99% of first-party code added; an estimated 99% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 98.6%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 98.6%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 55 61,356
OpenAI Codex 4 1,457

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 58,973 of 59,517.

Findings per 1,000 lines AI-attributed Other Ratio
Quality 3.256 14.706 0.22x
Security 0.254 0.0 n/a
  • Stylometry index: 0.13 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 16). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-08 20,652 100%
2026-09 43,036 98%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (fd7cf593ea67)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8b6b7cdab0d8)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e18cecff9ef4)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b5a6cfdf0062)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (61cfd09a7722)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (64b2efd18e00)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (06a018340911)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4192edbdcc07)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (97bc55b9aaf0)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a22ac356deb6)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c22291f45358)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (028f8250e12d)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (47bb5bcb44ae)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (91106d77c381)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c1012c4f59dc)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.02, no CI test run detected; 23% of function code in complex or long functions; 12% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 50
Duplication 48
Code smells (Opengrep) 58
Tests and CI 43
Documentation 65
Type safety 95
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 3,303; mean complexity 2.9, 90th percentile 6; 80 complex and 24 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 12.2% of 48,184 compared
  • Tests: 1,042 test lines for 59,517 source lines (ratio 0.02); CI test commands: none detected; 17% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 11 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies; 3 high-severity SAST findings; 4 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 97
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 64
CI workflows (zizmor) 44
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a

  • Known vulnerabilities: 11 in 4 packages (critical 0, high 3, medium 5, low 3)

  • Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] demos/_lib/demo-shell.js:155
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a btn.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] demos/_lib/demo-shell.js:155
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] scripts/freeze_probe.py:48
high osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q: source-map-js@1.2.1 (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q runtime/package-lock.json
high osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm: vite@6.4.3 (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm runtime/package-lock.json
high osv/GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5: zod@4.4.3 (npm) is affected by GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 runtime/package-lock.json
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy-pages.yml:35
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy-pages.yml:37
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy-pages.yml:74
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/deploy-pages.yml:79
medium opengrep/javascript.browser.security.wildcard-postmessage-configuration: The target origin of the window.postMessage() API is set to "*". This could allow for information disclosure due to the possibility of any origin allowed to receive the message. [confidence medium] demos/_lib/sfx.js:47
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] demos/_lib/sfx.js:346
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] gallery/build.mjs:70
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] gallery/build.mjs:85
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] gallery/build.mjs:92
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] gallery/build.mjs:176
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] gallery/build.mjs:757
medium opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] scripts/face_bbox.py:34
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp: RegExp() called with a id function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use hardcoded regexes instead. If your regex is run on user-controlled i [confidence low] scripts/pipeline_state.mjs:251
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp: RegExp() called with a k function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use hardcoded regexes instead. If your regex is run on user-controlled in [confidence low] workbench/scripts/gen-index.mjs:121
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string: This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS). [confidence low] workbench/scripts/gen-index.mjs:182
medium opengrep/javascript.playwright.security.audit.playwright-goto-injection: If unverified user data can reach the goto method it can result in Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities [confidence low] workbench/scripts/screenshots.mjs:40
medium osv/GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg: fast-uri@3.1.8 (npm) is affected by GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg runtime/package-lock.json
medium osv/GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr: fast-uri@3.1.8 (npm) is affected by GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr runtime/package-lock.json
medium osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv: vite@6.4.3 (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv runtime/package-lock.json

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

  • star-burst: 2312 stars in 83 days (28/day)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 59,517; test lines: 1,042
Language Lines
TypeScript 50,722
Python 5,464
JavaScript 4,197
Shell 176

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Vincentwei1021/video-talkcraft/)