iFurySt/open-computer-use
👾 Open Computer Use – Open-Source Alternative to Codex Computer Use
- Repository: https://github.com/iFurySt/open-computer-use
- Commit:
e25be21caa0ea489316f6be6635d2a4766c4cd0b - Generated: 2026-11-14T00:21:50+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 10 | explicit | 95% | 100% |
| Code quality | 62 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 79 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 10% of first-party code added; an estimated 10% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 10.1%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 21.3%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 10.1%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Codex | 26 | 7,123 |
| Claude Code | 7 | 598 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 4,126 of 58,251.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 0.727 | 0.794 | 0.92x |
| Security | 0.969 | 0.277 | 3.5x |
- Stylometry index: 0.24 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 28). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04 | 32,770 | 2% |
| 2026-05 | 3,729 | 19% |
| 2026-06 | 2,166 | 1% |
| 2026-07 | 2,221 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 186 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 3,269 | 5% |
| 2026-10 | 24,505 | 19% |
| 2026-11 | 7,483 | 20% |
Evidence
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/issue66-session-discovery' (02b7fe7899d1)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7c4074249974)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/require-release-notarization' (63145fc39414)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/visible-tree-budget' (bf7c12db88f9)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/pr138-review' (6505cbc09291)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/pr134-review' (c2c5d0e5f3e3)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/fix-locked-use-cold-auth-notarization' (21a33a460943)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/linux-selective-observation' (31a7d7da5f28)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/linux-hidden-details' (7cb8bb7cfb97)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/verify-release-1-1-2' (eb501f4b1fb1)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/linux-bounded-focus' (5e1f189f86ee)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/release-1-1-2' (531c9d4d6e2e)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/complete-npm-rename' (0daece0fd094)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/rename-open-computer-use' (5d948fc5846d)
- OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/linux-action-read-back' (1b6fd8f8354f)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.19, CI runs tests; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 14% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 58 |
| Duplication | 43 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 76 |
| Tests and CI | 74 |
| Documentation | 80 |
| Type safety | 0 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 2,985; mean complexity 3.6, 90th percentile 8; 90 complex and 24 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 14.0% of 42,835 compared
- Tests: 10,781 test lines for 58,251 source lines (ratio 0.19); CI test commands: go test; 30% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: changelog
Most complex functions:
- handle in packages/OpenComputerUseKit/Sources/OpenComputerUseKit/LockedUseBrokerCoordinator.swift: complexity 178, 189 lines
- probe in experiments/LockedUse/Sources/Guardian/LockScreenInteractor.swift: complexity 99, 186 lines
- read in experiments/LockedUse/Sources/Broker/BrokerMain.swift: complexity 56, 112 lines
- handle in apps/OpenComputerUse/Sources/OpenComputerUse/MacOSAppAgentProxy.swift: complexity 49, 133 lines
- runWatchdog in experiments/LockedUse/Sources/Guardian/GuardianMain.swift: complexity 48, 66 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 18 high-severity SAST findings; 6 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 94 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 90 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 100 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 40 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 40 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: security policy; missing: dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
scripts/computer-use-cli/app_server.go:141 |
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
scripts/computer-use-cli/main.go:359 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-native-validation.py:27 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-native-validation.py:72 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-native-validation.py:151 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-native-validation.py:182 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-native-validation.py:194 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-rehearsal.py:21 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-rehearsal.py:24 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-rehearsal.py:57 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-rehearsal.py:75 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-smoke.py:65 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
scripts/run-locked-use-smoke.py:65 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-smoke.py:79 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
scripts/run-locked-use-smoke.py:79 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-unshielded-diagnostic.py:37 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-unshielded-diagnostic.py:48 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/run-locked-use-unshielded-diagnostic.py:55 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:22 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:23 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:24 |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:35 |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:54 |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:59 |
| medium | opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] |
packages/LockedUseNative/PeerIdentity.c:16 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.4 ships CursorMotion-1.1.4.dmg (6 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.4 ships Open-Computer-Use-1.1.4-macOS-universal.app.zip (43 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.4 ships open-computer-use-cli-1.1.4-linux-amd64.tar.gz (14 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.4 ships open-computer-use-cli-1.1.4-linux-arm64.tar.gz (5 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.4 ships open-computer-use-cli-1.1.4-windows-amd64.zip (64 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 58,251; test lines: 10,781
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Swift | 40,028 |
| Go | 7,461 |
| Python | 7,058 |
| JavaScript | 5,937 |
| PowerShell | 4,389 |
| Shell | 3,365 |
| C | 415 |
| Objective-C | 379 |