RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py

A Python library to parse malformed XML

  • View repository ↗
  • Python
  • ★ 114
  • commit 74a02907a402
  • scored 2026-11-13
  • scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
49%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

71/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

62/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 49% 100%
Code quality 71 adequate 90% 100%
Security 62 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

  • Stylometry index: 1.80 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 1, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-06 5,497 0%
2026-01 129 0%

Evidence

  • CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
  • step-by-step narration comment: # First, find all entity positions to avoid escaping & characters within entities (sloppy_xml.p)
  • placeholder or demo-only phrasing: # This is a simplified implementation - could be much more sophisticated (sloppy_xml.p)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.97, CI runs tests; 59% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 17
Duplication 66
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 100
Documentation 85
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 37; mean complexity 5.6, 90th percentile 15; 3 complex and 1 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 7.0% of 1,304 compared
  • Tests: 1,613 test lines for 1,662 source lines (ratio 0.97); CI test commands: pytest; 54% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 2 high-severity SAST findings; 7 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 73
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 26
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] sloppy_xml.py:13
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] sloppy_xml.py:1194
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:16
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:19
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:33
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:36
high zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:19
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:17
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/test.yml:20
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:16
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/test.yml:17
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/test.yml:10
info zizmor/superfluous-actions: action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:36

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 1,662; test lines: 1,613
Language Lines
Python 3,275

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/mitsuhiko/sloppy-xml-py/)